Myers-Briggs: The World’s Favourite Personality Test - But Does It Hold Up?
Explore the strengths and weaknesses of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in understanding personality and enhancing team dynamics.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most popular personality tests in the world, used by 88% of Fortune 500 companies and millions of people annually. Its appeal lies in its simplicity and practicality, especially for team-building and leadership development. However, critics argue that it oversimplifies personality, lacks scientific evidence, and produces inconsistent results over time.
Key Points:
- What It Does Well:
-
Main Issues:
- Simplifies personality into rigid categories.
- Results can change within weeks, questioning reliability.
- No strong scientific backing compared to models like the Big Five.
-
Best Use Cases:
- Team-building, conflict resolution, and personal growth.
- Not suitable for hiring, performance reviews, or career planning.
While MBTI can be a helpful tool for understanding preferences and improving collaboration, it’s best used alongside other evidence-based methods like the Big Five or HEXACO models for a more accurate and reliable approach to personality and leadership.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) | Is it a Valid Personality Test?
Understanding MBTI: Core Components
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) breaks down personality into 16 distinct types, using four paired dimensions to shed light on how people naturally think and act.
The 4 Personality Pairs
These dimensions not only help categorise personalities but also provide insights into behavioural tendencies in different situations:
| Preference Pair | Measures | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Extraversion (E) / Introversion (I) | Energy source | E: Gains energy from social interaction I: Recharges through quiet reflection |
| Sensing (S) / Intuition (N) | Information gathering | S: Prefers concrete details and facts N: Focuses on patterns and future possibilities |
| Thinking (T) / Feeling (F) | Decision-making | T: Bases decisions on logic and objectivity F: Prioritises values and relationships |
| Judging (J) / Perceiving (P) | World organisation | J: Prefers structure and planning P: Adopts a flexible and spontaneous approach |
As Isabel Briggs Myers once said: "By developing individual strengths, guarding against weaknesses, and appreciating the strengths of other types, life will be more amusing, more interesting, and more of a daily adventure than it could possibly be if everyone were alike".
Taking the MBTI Test
The MBTI assessment is straightforward and structured. The official test involves a detailed questionnaire, expert analysis, and access to in-depth resources. It typically takes about 45 minutes to complete and costs £47.95 ($59.95). The results provide clear insights, which is why the MBTI is widely embraced in workplaces and beyond.
MBTI at Work
An impressive 90% of Fortune 100 companies integrate the MBTI into their team-building and hiring strategies. Its insights are invaluable for improving communication, identifying leadership styles, resolving conflicts, aligning roles with individual strengths, and supporting career growth.
"The MBTI assessment is a tool that helps people increase their self-awareness, understand and appreciate differences in others, and apply personality insights to improve their personal and professional effectiveness." - The Myers-Briggs Company
It’s important to remember that MBTI highlights preferences, not skills, abilities, or competencies. It’s not designed to make hiring decisions. Instead, its true value lies in fostering an understanding of diverse work styles, enabling teams to collaborate more effectively.
MBTI's Main Benefits
Straightforward and Accessible
The MBTI owes much of its popularity to its simplicity and clarity. Unlike some psychological tools that can feel overly complex, the MBTI breaks down personality traits into easy-to-understand language. This makes it accessible to professionals from all walks of life, regardless of their familiarity with psychology. Its design offers insights that are both practical and relatable, without requiring any specialised knowledge. With around 3.5 million assessments taken every year, its wide appeal is evident.
A Path to Self-Awareness
This simplicity doesn’t come at the cost of depth. The MBTI is a powerful tool for self-discovery, helping individuals uncover their natural inclinations and identify areas they might want to refine, especially in professional settings.
| Area of Impact | Benefits |
|---|---|
| Communication Style | Helps individuals understand their preferred ways of communicating |
| Decision-Making | Sheds light on how they naturally approach problems |
| Stress Management | Identifies triggers and suggests coping strategies |
| Learning Preferences | Highlights the most effective ways they absorb information |
"From the onset of MBTI assessment and Step II certification, I better understand my own preferences and how to leverage those in my role as an internal consultant." – Gary Westbroek, Organisational Development Consultant, Intermountain Health Care
These insights don’t just benefit individuals - they also contribute to creating stronger, more cohesive teams.
Strengthening Team Dynamics
In UK workplaces, the MBTI has become a go-to resource for improving team interactions and collaboration. By understanding personality differences, teams can work together more effectively:
- Clearer Communication: Teams gain awareness of how colleagues prefer to communicate, which reduces misunderstandings.
- Better Collaboration: Recognising individual strengths helps in assigning tasks where team members can excel.
- Smoother Conflict Resolution: Awareness of differing problem-solving styles helps teams navigate disagreements more constructively.
"We use the MBTI® assessment about ten times per year and it always sparks amazing conversation. It brings such self-awareness to our students that the MBTI certified trainers here find it priceless." – Allison Gross-Ebert, US Department of State
The MBTI’s success in team settings highlights its value for organisations aiming to build inclusive and cooperative environments. By encouraging understanding and collaboration, it becomes a vital tool for fostering workplace harmony.
Key Problems with MBTI
While the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) remains a popular tool for understanding personality, it comes with notable challenges that raise questions about its effectiveness.
Oversimplified Categories
The MBTI simplifies human personality into binary categories, which can overlook the complexity of individual traits. This reductionist approach is especially problematic in professional environments, where a deeper understanding of personality is often necessary.
Research indicates that personality traits typically follow a bell curve distribution, rather than fitting neatly into one of two extremes. Even Carl Jung, whose theories inspired the MBTI, acknowledged this nuance:
"There is no such thing as a pure extrovert or a pure introvert. Such a man would be in the lunatic asylum. Those are only terms to designate a certain penchant, a certain tendency."
By forcing individuals into rigid categories, the MBTI risks promoting stereotypes and could hinder professional growth opportunities.
Test Results Inconsistency
Another significant issue is the inconsistency of MBTI results over time, which undermines its reliability for long-term use in professional settings.
| Time Period | Variation Rate | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 4 weeks | More than 1/3 receive different results | Questions short-term reliability |
| 5 weeks | Up to 50% different classifications | Raises concerns about stability |
| Long-term | Between 39-76% variation | Challenges usefulness for career planning |
Such variability creates problems when organisations rely on MBTI for training or development programmes, only to find that employees’ classifications can shift in a matter of weeks.
Lack of Scientific Evidence
The MBTI also faces criticism for its weak scientific grounding. Unlike evidence-based models like the Big Five, it lacks robust empirical support, particularly in workplace applications.
Some of its scientific limitations include:
- Failing to measure emotional stability, a key dimension in personality psychology.
- No proven connection between MBTI types and job performance or team dynamics.
- A tendency toward cultural bias, limiting its relevance in diverse work environments.
Organisational psychologist Adam Grant highlights these shortcomings:
"In social science, we use four standards: are the categories reliable, valid, independent, and comprehensive? For the MBTI, the evidence says not very, no, no, and not really."
Even the creators of the MBTI acknowledge its limitations:
"The MBTI assessment is not designed to be used for hiring purposes. It does not measure ability, competence, or skill - rather it focuses on self-understanding and personal/professional growth and development."
These criticisms underline the importance of approaching MBTI with caution, particularly when applying it to leadership or organisational development.
Best and Worst Uses of MBTI
Understanding how to apply the MBTI framework effectively can help you make the most of its insights while steering clear of potential missteps.
Recommended Uses
The MBTI provides a structure for:
- Improving communication: Helps individuals understand how others process information and express themselves.
- Building self-awareness: Encourages reflection on personal preferences and behaviours.
- Facilitating team-building: Promotes appreciation of diverse working styles.
- Resolving conflicts: Offers tools to navigate personality-based misunderstandings.
"The MBTI assessment is a tool that helps people increase their self-awareness, understand and appreciate differences in others, and apply personality insights to improve their personal and professional effectiveness." – The Myers-Briggs Company
When used thoughtfully, MBTI can enhance team dynamics. For instance, giving introverted team members time to reflect before contributing in meetings can lead to more balanced discussions. However, misusing MBTI can diminish its value and create unnecessary challenges.
When Not to Use MBTI
There are clear situations where MBTI is inappropriate, as shown below:
| Scenario | Reason to Avoid | Potential Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment | It cannot predict job performance | Legal and ethical complications |
| Performance assessment | Does not measure skills | Risk of unfair evaluations |
| Career planning | Results may shift over time | Limits options unnecessarily |
| Leadership assessment | Lacks scientific backing | Overlooking capable individuals |
"It is unethical and in many cases illegal to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the results will be used to screen out applicants." – Myers-Briggs
UK Workplace Considerations
In the UK, MBTI should align with local workplace norms and practices to be effective and respectful of individual preferences.
Effective Applications:
- Development programmes aimed at professional growth
- Team-building activities to foster collaboration
- Improving workplace communication
- Addressing and resolving conflicts
Cultural Sensitivities:
- Respecting privacy and personal boundaries
- Focusing on practical applications rather than abstract theories
- Encouraging collaboration over competition
- Considering diverse perspectives in the workplace
A 2017 study revealed that 32% of candidates for executive roles were asked to complete personality tests during the hiring process. However, MBTI’s role in such scenarios remains controversial.
Organisational Best Practices:
- Present MBTI as a tool for development, not judgement.
- Emphasise that it highlights preferences, not abilities.
- Combine MBTI insights with other developmental methods.
- Ensure participation is entirely voluntary.
- Keep results confidential to protect individual privacy.
MBTI works best when viewed as one of many resources for personal and professional growth, rather than as a definitive measure of someone’s personality or capabilities.
Other Leadership Assessment Tools
While the MBTI remains popular, other scientifically grounded tools offer more nuanced perspectives on personality and leadership.
The Big Five Model
The Big Five addresses the limitations of MBTI's binary categories by using continuous scales, providing a more detailed view of personality traits and their influence on leadership styles. This model evaluates five core dimensions:
| Trait | Leadership Impact | Focus for Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Openness | Encourages innovation | Enhancing creative problem-solving |
| Conscientiousness | Promotes organisation | Building structured processes |
| Extraversion | Drives team engagement | Balancing social interactions |
| Agreeableness | Shapes collaboration styles | Developing diplomatic approaches |
| Neuroticism | Influences stress management | Strengthening emotional resilience |
Research highlights the value of diverse teams in decision-making. For instance, teams with varied personality types are 60% more effective at making decisions compared to homogenous groups. Similarly, IBM saw a 12% boost in employee retention in 2019 after introducing personality-based role matching. By examining leadership through a spectrum of traits, the Big Five complements other models, offering a broader understanding of leadership dynamics.
The HEXACO System
Expanding on the Big Five, the HEXACO model introduces a sixth dimension - Honesty-Humility - bringing ethical considerations into focus.
Key benefits of HEXACO include:
- Ethical insights: Evaluates moral and ethical dimensions of personality.
- Empathy-focused: Replaces Neuroticism with Emotionality to better reflect emotional understanding.
- Inclusivity: Adapts well to diverse workplace environments.
By incorporating these elements, HEXACO offers a more comprehensive lens to assess leadership qualities, particularly in ethically challenging or multicultural contexts.
Story-Based Leadership Tools
Narrative-based approaches shift the focus to how leaders craft and share their vision, offering a more dynamic and personal method of leadership development. A compelling example comes from a Midwest bookstore during the COVID-19 pandemic. The general manager initiated virtual "storytime" sessions, allowing staff to share experiences. This initiative not only boosted morale but also led to increased voluntary overtime during peak periods.
Key advantages of story-based tools include:
- Genuine communication: Helps leaders create authentic narratives that resonate with their teams.
- Emotional connection: Strengthens bonds through shared experiences.
- Flexibility: Adapts to leadership growth and evolving challenges.
"Stories have an immense power to shape how we perceive ourselves and our place in the world. As leaders seeking to enact positive change within our organizations, mastering the art of crafting an empowering narrative can be a vital tool." – Innovative Human Capital
Storytelling is a powerful learning tool, with humans acquiring 70% of their knowledge through stories. For example, a Colorado food bank developed an origin story with its long-term volunteers, leading to a 20% increase in retention. By combining data-driven insights with the emotional depth of storytelling, leaders can refine their strategic vision while fostering stronger team engagement.
Conclusion: MBTI's Place in Leadership Today
Despite its mixed reputation, the MBTI continues to occupy a notable role in leadership development. Its widespread use in UK organisations highlights both its appeal and limitations. With over 2 million assessments conducted annually and more than half of FTSE 100 companies incorporating psychometric tools, MBTI remains a familiar presence in professional settings.
The primary strength of the MBTI lies in its ability to promote self-awareness and enhance team dynamics. However, its reliability is often questioned, as studies show that 39% to 76% of participants may receive a different classification within five weeks. This makes it more appropriate for activities like team workshops, improving communication, personal reflection, and resolving conflicts. It is less suited for high-stakes decisions such as recruitment, performance evaluations, career planning, or promotions.
The Myers-Briggs Company's two decades of experience in leadership development suggest that the tool delivers the best results when:
- Incorporated as part of a broader development strategy
- Administered by trained and qualified practitioners
- Aligned with clear organisational goals
- Accompanied by thorough debriefing sessions
Interestingly, 89% of Fortune 100 companies continue to use the MBTI, proving its value when paired with other evidence-based methods. This observation echoes earlier discussions about the MBTI's practical advantages and scientific limitations. When used thoughtfully, it serves as an effective starting point for exploring work styles and team interactions. However, its true potential is realised only when organisations acknowledge its boundaries and embed it within a well-rounded leadership development framework.
FAQs
How does the Myers-Briggs compare to scientifically validated personality tests like the Big Five or HEXACO?
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is well-known for its widespread use and straightforward approach, but it has faced criticism for lacking scientific robustness. Unlike models such as the Big Five or HEXACO, which evaluate personality traits along a spectrum and are supported by strong empirical research, the MBTI relies on a binary framework that oversimplifies the intricacies of human personality.
While the Big Five and HEXACO are highly respected for their ability to predict behaviour and psychological outcomes, the MBTI falls short in terms of predictive validity and is not widely accepted as a reliable tool in professional or scientific settings. Despite this, its simplicity and appeal for self-reflection have kept it popular among individuals seeking personal insights, even if it doesn't meet the standards of scientific precision.
Why do some organisations still use the MBTI despite concerns about its reliability?
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) remains a popular tool among organisations due to its simplicity, accessibility, and widespread recognition. Its user-friendly framework encourages employees to explore their personality traits and communication preferences, which can help strengthen team relationships and enhance workplace interactions.
Although the MBTI has been criticised for its scientific limitations and binary categorisation, its clear, type-based approach often resonates more with employers than the intricate nature of trait-based assessments. This blend of ease, familiarity, and practicality keeps it firmly embedded in many professional environments.
What ethical issues should organisations consider when using the MBTI in hiring or performance evaluations?
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in recruitment or performance evaluations comes with significant ethical challenges. Its binary framework and lack of predictive accuracy make it an unreliable measure for determining job suitability or evaluating performance. Notably, the Myers & Briggs Foundation explicitly advises against using the MBTI for hiring decisions.
When applied in these settings, the MBTI can unintentionally introduce biases and lead to discrimination, potentially disadvantaging certain individuals or groups. To promote fairness and inclusivity, organisations should limit the MBTI’s use to self-reflection purposes, such as personal growth or enhancing team dynamics, rather than employing it as a tool for professional assessments.