Personality Tests: Insight or Illusion?

Are personality tests worth it? They can improve workplace performance and retention, but they also have limitations. Here's what you need to know:

• Benefits: Companies report a 30% boost in team performance and 24% better retention when using personality tests.
• Limitations: Some tests, like the MBTI, can produce inconsistent results (50% chance of different outcomes within a month). Others, like DISC, focus only on behaviours, not deeper traits.
• Popular Tests:
  • MBTI: Widely used but lacks scientific reliability.
  • DISC: Great for team behaviour but not for predicting job success.
  • Big Five: Scientifically robust and measures traits on a spectrum.
  • HEXACO: Adds an honesty dimension, useful for ethics-based roles.
  • Hogan: Strong for leadership and talent management.
  • Enneagram: Insightful for motivations but lacks empirical support.

Quick Comparison

Key takeaway: Personality tests are tools, not answers. Use them alongside other methods like interviews and performance reviews to get a fuller picture.

Do personality tests work? - Merve Emre

1. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) continues to be one of the most widely used personality assessments, with around two million adults completing it annually. Developed by Isabel Myers and Katherine Briggs, inspired by Carl Jung's theories, the MBTI categorises personalities using four key dichotomies.

While the MBTI framework is straightforward and widely recognised, questions about its reliability remain. Despite this, 88% of companies across 115 countries incorporate it into their processes.

Matthew Channell, Commercial Director at TSW Training, highlights its workplace appeal:

"The Myers Briggs Type Indicator, or MBTI, is one of the most widely used personality tests for leaders who want to identify the strengths, communication styles, and leadership preferences of their staff".

However, the MBTI has faced scientific criticism. For example, one study suggested it could be 38% more effective in predicting major life outcomes if it didn’t force traits into binary categories. Additionally, its failure to measure neuroticism - a key predictor of life outcomes - limits its overall usefulness.

Workplace Implementation Considerations

• Team Development
When applied thoughtfully, the MBTI can enhance team dynamics by revealing communication preferences and working styles. However, it should complement other tools rather than serve as the sole method for team building.

• Leadership Development
While 89% of Fortune 100 companies use the MBTI for leadership development, its ability to predict leadership success remains unproven. It works best as a starting point for discussions rather than as a definitive measure.

• Recruitment Limitations
The MBTI is not a reliable predictor of job performance. Researchers Bjork and Druckman have pointed out that much of the supporting research relies on flawed methodologies.

The MBTI encourages self-awareness and helps individuals understand communication styles, but it has its limits. Organisations should use it as part of a broader assessment approach, keeping in mind that it identifies preferences, not abilities or competencies.

Next, we’ll explore the DISC Assessment to provide further insights into personality assessment tools.

2. DISC Assessment

The DISC assessment is a widely-used tool for analysing behaviour, focusing on four key dimensions: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. With over one million people using it annually, DISC has become a go-to framework for understanding workplace behaviour and communication styles.

Core Components and Uses

Taking the DISC assessment typically takes 15–20 minutes and involves answering around 80 questions. Its focus on observable behaviours makes it particularly useful in professional settings.

Business Impact and Practical Use

DISC insights can lead to measurable improvements in workplace performance:

• 20% faster project delivery by improving communication and assigning roles effectively.
• 25% higher customer satisfaction by aligning behaviours with client needs.
• 30% increase in sales conversions when teams applied DISC principles.
• 22% boost in employee retention when used as part of the hiring process.

With over four decades of research by Wiley, DISC has been fine-tuned to help businesses:

• Build balanced teams by understanding behavioural dynamics.
• Adjust management strategies to suit different personality types.
• Navigate interpersonal challenges with structured approaches.
• Customise communication styles to align with customer preferences.

Scientific Backing

DISC is most effective when applied thoughtfully. For example, a Russian study found a reliability coefficient of 0.89 when participants were retested after a week. However, compared to the Big Five model, which accounts for 80% of personality differences, DISC focuses more narrowly on observable behaviours, making it a complementary tool rather than a standalone solution.

Limitations and Points to Consider

The success of DISC depends on how it’s implemented:

• It measures behavioural tendencies, not skills or emotional intelligence.
• Works best when paired with other assessment tools for a fuller picture.
• Should guide development and team strategies, rather than dictate hiring decisions.
• Reassessments may be needed, as behaviour can shift over time.

Teams incorporating DISC have reported a 34% increase in productivity. While DISC excels in specific contexts, it also serves as a stepping stone for exploring broader personality frameworks.

3. Big Five (OCEAN) Model

The Big Five model, often referred to as OCEAN, stands out as one of the most rigorously validated frameworks for understanding personality. Unlike assessments that categorise individuals into fixed types, this model evaluates traits on a spectrum, offering a more nuanced view of human behaviour.

Core Dimensions and Their Workplace Relevance

Each of the five traits plays a distinct role in shaping behaviours and outcomes in professional settings:

These traits provide a foundation for understanding workplace dynamics, from team interactions to individual performance.

Scientific Support and Global Research

The Big Five model's credibility is underpinned by extensive cross-cultural research spanning 50 societies across six continents. Key findings include:

• High internal consistency observed in South America, while some African contexts report lower consistency.
• Research within Zimbabwean Shona communities found a reliability coefficient of 0.64 for the Openness trait.
• Studies reveal that national differences account for a modest 3.1% to 11.0% of personality variance, underscoring its universal relevance.

Practical Applications in Organisations

The Big Five framework has proven to be a practical tool for improving organisational outcomes, particularly in these areas:

• Recruitment and Selection: HR teams use Big Five assessments to align candidates with roles, enhancing job satisfaction and reducing turnover.
• Team Development: Understanding team members' personality profiles enables:
  • Task allocation based on individual strengths.
  • Tailored communication strategies.
  • More effective conflict resolution.
• Leadership Development: Leaders who grasp personality differences can adapt their management styles, boosting team cohesion and performance.

Challenges and Limitations

While the Big Five model is widely respected, it is not without its criticisms:

• Self-reported data can introduce bias and inaccuracies.
• The assumption that personality traits remain stable over time may overlook personal growth and change.
• It does not account for traits like honesty or humility, which some argue are crucial.

"The five-factor model offers a universal and comprehensive framework for the description of individual differences in personality." – McCrae and Costa

Additionally, with heritability estimates around 50%, the model highlights the interplay between genetics and environmental factors in shaping personality.

Current Use and Future Directions

Organisations increasingly integrate the Big Five into broader assessment strategies, combining it with other tools to create well-rounded evaluation frameworks. This approach balances the model's focus on stable traits with the need to account for adaptable behaviours. As research continues, there is room to refine and expand these frameworks, paving the way for deeper insights into leadership and workplace dynamics.

4. HEXACO Assessment

The HEXACO model takes personality assessment a step further by introducing a sixth dimension to the mix. Developed by Kibeom Lee and Michael C. Ashton in the early 2000s, this framework is the result of extensive lexical analysis conducted across multiple languages.

Core Dimensions and What Sets HEXACO Apart

HEXACO stands out by adding Honesty-Humility to the traditional five-factor model. Below is a breakdown of its six dimensions and their relevance in workplace settings:

Backing It Up with Research

The HEXACO model’s effectiveness is well-documented:

• Studies indicate it is 1.5 times better at predicting deviant workplace behaviour compared to older models.
• The Honesty-Humility trait alone explains 14% of the variance in altruistic behaviour - nearly three times the impact of traditional Agreeableness measures.
• Research involving 337 telecommunications employees showed strong links between HEXACO traits and empowered leadership.

These findings highlight its practical value, particularly in professional environments.

How HEXACO Fits into Organisations

HEXACO assessments have found their place in several organisational processes:

• Recruitment and Selection: With a minimum of 60 questions, HEXACO helps companies assess candidates thoroughly, focusing on traits like work ethic and alignment with workplace culture.
• Employee Development: By pinpointing strengths and growth areas across the six dimensions, the model enables tailored development programmes.
• Performance Management: Managers can use HEXACO insights to refine their leadership strategies and improve succession planning.

Despite its benefits, the model isn’t without its challenges, particularly when applied across different cultures.

Challenges and Cultural Considerations

While the HEXACO model is powerful, it has limitations:

• Its cross-cultural validity can vary, with studies showing inconsistent results for the Honesty-Humility dimension in certain societies.
• The model’s complexity may not lend itself well to situations requiring quick assessments.

"People tend to hold onto the notion that their results are fixed and conclusive, but our personalities change and evolve over time." – Dr Michele Goldman, Hope for Depression Research Foundation

Current Use and What Lies Ahead

Organisations are increasingly combining HEXACO with other evaluation tools to create a more balanced and nuanced approach to understanding personality. This blended strategy helps address cultural biases while leveraging HEXACO’s predictive strengths for professional applications.

5. Enneagram System

The Enneagram system offers an intriguing framework for understanding personality, often used in professional development and personal growth. While it can provide valuable insights, its true potential is best realised when paired with more scientifically validated tools.

Scientific Foundation and Validity

A 2020 review of 104 samples highlighted mixed reliability and validity for the Enneagram system. Specific evaluations of the Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator (RHETI) revealed the following:

This data provides a foundation for understanding how the Enneagram is applied, particularly in organisational settings.

Professional Applications and Impact

Research highlights the Enneagram's potential impact on workplace dynamics:

• Teams reported up to a 40% improvement in performance after using Enneagram-based emotional intelligence tools. However, only 34% of managers could accurately identify their team members' types.
• A striking 92% of team members acknowledged experiencing tension linked to at least one core team behaviour.

These findings suggest that, when used thoughtfully, the Enneagram can contribute to better team understanding and collaboration.

Strengths and Limitations

The Enneagram brings both advantages and challenges to the table:

These mixed qualities have led to varied opinions among professionals and researchers.

Expert Perspectives

"The Enneagram is a non-rigorous, pragmatic personality modeling system that lets you identify the relative neurological expense of different social interactions and emotional expressions so you can best typify love and grace in a way that's most neuro-palatable in your context."
– Mike McHargue

This perspective highlights the Enneagram's practical, albeit less scientific, approach to understanding personality.

Current Research and Future Outlook

Recent studies have examined how the Enneagram aligns with established personality models. Key findings include:

• Partial alignment with the Big Five personality traits.
• Limited evidence supporting secondary aspects like wings and intertype movement.
• Emerging indications of its usefulness in personal development.

These findings suggest that while the Enneagram offers some valuable insights, its scientific basis remains a topic of debate.

Practical Implementation Considerations

To make the most of the Enneagram in practical settings:

• Use it as a complementary tool rather than a primary assessment method.
• Focus on its ability to reveal motivations and communication styles.
• Pair its insights with validated tools for a more comprehensive approach.
• Stay aware of its limitations to avoid misapplication, particularly in team dynamics.

Ultimately, the Enneagram's strength lies in its capacity to spark conversations about personality differences and improve teamwork. When combined with more robust tools, it can serve as a helpful resource for fostering greater understanding and collaboration in the workplace.

6. Hogan Assessment

The Hogan Assessment stands out as a scientifically grounded tool designed for leadership development. By combining insights into everyday behaviours with an evaluation of potential derailers, it provides a balanced perspective on personality and leadership traits.

Scientific Foundation and Global Reach

The Hogan Assessment has a strong global presence and scientific backing, making it a trusted resource for organisations worldwide.

Business Impact Across Sectors

The assessment has demonstrated measurable benefits across industries, highlighting its effectiveness in improving performance, retention, and cost efficiency.

Assessment Components

The Hogan Assessment evaluates individuals through three key lenses:

• Bright Side: Examines everyday workplace behaviours and leadership potential, focusing on interpersonal effectiveness.
• Dark Side: Identifies stress-related patterns and potential derailers, helping organisations mitigate risks.
• Core Values: Explores motivational drivers and indicators of workplace fit.

Cross-Cultural Considerations

Hogan’s global reach requires careful attention to cultural nuances. Its adaptability ensures relevance across diverse regions.

"Overall, the research concludes that the effects of culture on personality are hard to define and while some differences may exist, it appears we are more alike than we are different." - Hogan Assessments

Practical Implementation Results

Organisations integrating Hogan into their leadership frameworks have reported impressive results:

• Financial Services: 50% reduction in loss rates
• Education: 10% boost in graduation rates
• Industrial: 800% increase in engagement levels
• Transportation: 77% drop in absenteeism

Development Applications

Hogan plays a pivotal role in areas such as executive coaching, identifying high-potential employees, team dynamics analysis, and planning for leadership succession. These applications make it a valuable tool in modern talent management.

Technical Validation

The Hogan Assessment meets rigorous international standards, with endorsements from the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, the Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, and the British Psychological Society. This validation underscores its reliability and credibility in professional settings.

Benefits and Limitations

Recognising the strengths and weaknesses of personality assessments is essential to making the most of them in professional settings. While recent research highlights their potential advantages, it also underscores notable challenges in their application.

Demonstrated Benefits

When used effectively, personality assessments can deliver measurable workplace improvements:

• 30% increase in employee retention rates
• 20% boost in overall job satisfaction

Test-Specific Analysis

The table below outlines the strengths, limitations, and best uses of some popular personality assessments:

Implementation Risks

Despite their advantages, personality assessments come with potential risks that organisations must address:

• Impact on Hiring Processes
  With 60% of workers encountering these tests during recruitment, the way they are implemented matters. Misuse of biased assessments has led to a 35% reduction in retention rates among minority groups in some companies.
• Concerns About Validity
  A review of Fortune 500 companies found that 40% fail to validate their personality tests scientifically. This can undermine both fairness and effectiveness.
• Cultural Bias
  Research from the American Psychological Association highlights that culturally biased tests can lead to scoring disparities of up to 40% between minority and majority groups.

"Unconscious bias is an innate human characteristic; even the most open-minded and well-meaning individuals unwittingly allow unconscious feelings to guide their decision-making." – Matt Mickiewicz

Best Practice Guidelines

To navigate these challenges and optimise results, organisations should follow these steps:

• Use personality tests as part of a broader evaluation process.
• Validate assessments for the specific job roles they are being applied to.
• Train evaluators to recognise and mitigate implicit bias.
• Complement test results with qualitative data from interviews and performance reviews.

Financial Impact

Adopting these best practices can also lead to tangible financial benefits. For example:

Legal Considerations

The risks associated with improper use of personality assessments are not just theoretical. In 2018, Best Buy Co. Inc. settled a case with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after claims that their practices negatively impacted candidates based on race and national origin.

Key Findings and Recommendations

After examining the benefits, limitations, and specific applications of these tools, we’ve distilled key findings and actionable recommendations.

Research shows that 71% of organisations utilise these tools for leadership development, but their success depends heavily on how they are implemented.

Core Implementation Guidelines

To maximise effectiveness, organisations should adopt these evidence-based strategies:

Critical Success Factors

The integration of personality data with behavioural observations significantly enhances accuracy. Organisations that adopt comprehensive strategies - merging personality insights with performance metrics - report engagement rates rising by as much as 30%.

However, to sustain success, it’s crucial to address common challenges and potential risks.

Risk Mitigation Strategies

✓ Validate Assessment Tools: Regularly review and update tools to ensure they remain relevant and free from bias.

✓ Employ Multiple Evaluation Methods: Diversify your assessment approach with tools such as:

• Pulse surveys
• 360-degree feedback
• Situational judgment tests
• Peer evaluations

✓ Adapt to Diverse Contexts: Tailor methods to respect varied perspectives and cultural values.

Future-Focused Applications

With risks managed, forward-looking organisations are adopting advanced practices, including:

• AI Integration: Use AI-driven tools with embedded bias monitoring.
• Culturally Specific Metrics: Develop evaluation criteria tailored to specific organisational cultures.
• Personalised Development Plans: Craft individualised paths for growth and advancement.

While personality tests serve as a valuable starting point, they are most effective when paired with complementary evaluation methods. This layered approach ensures a more holistic and accurate understanding of individuals and teams.

FAQs

How can businesses use personality tests in recruitment and employee development while avoiding bias?

To make the most of personality tests in recruitment and employee development, it's essential to choose assessments that are both reliable and aligned with your organisation's values and the specific requirements of the role. Tools like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or the Big Five Personality Traits can offer useful insights into how candidates might behave or fit within a team. That said, these tests should only be one piece of the puzzle and should always be paired with interviews and other assessment methods to avoid leaning too heavily on a single approach.

Fairness is key when using these tools. Tests must be designed to minimise bias across different demographic groups, and hiring managers should receive training to spot and counteract their own cognitive biases. Adding standardised processes and structured interviews into the mix can further ensure decisions are both fair and consistent. Regularly reviewing how well these methods work will help maintain a hiring process that supports diversity and inclusivity while meeting organisational goals.

What are the limitations of popular personality tests like MBTI and DISC, and how reliable are they for workplace use?

Personality tests like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the DISC assessment come with some well-documented shortcomings, especially when applied in workplace settings. The MBTI, for instance, is frequently criticised for its inconsistent results over time - you might not get the same outcome if you retake it - and its dubious accuracy, as it often fails to measure what it claims or predict job performance reliably. Similarly, the DISC assessment, though popular, examines only a narrow slice of personality and lacks strong scientific evidence to validate its reliability.

While these tools can provide basic insights into areas like communication preferences or team interactions, they should be treated with caution. They are not comprehensive indicators of an individual’s abilities or potential and work best when paired with other evaluation methods in professional environments.

How does the Honesty-Humility trait in the HEXACO model help predict ethical behaviour in the workplace?

The Honesty-Humility dimension within the HEXACO model serves as a crucial indicator of ethical behaviour in professional environments. This trait emphasises qualities like integrity, fairness, and sincerity - key components that help build trust and encourage collaboration in the workplace.

People with high scores in Honesty-Humility tend to prioritise ethical actions, steer clear of exploiting others, and embrace a cooperative approach. These tendencies not only enhance workplace relationships but also help minimise unethical conduct, making this trait a vital lens for understanding professional behaviour.

Related posts

• Reading Faces: Emotional Intelligence for Leaders
• Exploring Psychodynamics at Work: The Hidden Forces Behind Team Behaviour
• Leading from Behind: Empowering Others to Shine
• VIA Character Strengths: Discovering Your Inner Virtues