The CEO Is Not the Only Messenger

Relying on the CEO as the sole communicator slows organisations down. This approach causes delays, miscommunication, and disengagement, leaving employees waiting for updates and leaders overwhelmed. By shifting to shared leadership messaging, companies can distribute communication responsibilities, speed up decision-making, and improve clarity across teams.

Key Takeaways:

• Bottlenecks: CEO-only messaging creates delays, especially during critical periods like leadership transitions.
• Miscommunication Risks: Messages can get distorted as they pass through layers, leading to confusion and misinformation.
• Leadership Disengagement: Centralising communication discourages other leaders from stepping up, weakening overall engagement.
• Shared Messaging Benefits: Distributing communication duties improves employee trust, speeds up updates, and strengthens leadership at all levels.

Shared leadership messaging ensures faster, clearer, and more effective communication by engaging leaders across the organisation. It’s time to move beyond relying on one voice.

71. Strategy Success: How to Communicate Your Gameplan

Problems with CEO-Only Messaging

Relying solely on a CEO to deliver all organisational communications creates several challenges that can hinder progress and weaken overall operations.

Communication Delays and Bottlenecks

One of the most obvious issues with CEO-only messaging is the delay it inevitably causes. When every critical announcement or update depends on a single individual’s availability, the pace of communication slows to match theirs. This can be particularly problematic during pivotal moments, such as leadership transitions.

Research indicates that meetings and emails can drop by about 20% in the first three months following a CEO change. Unfortunately, this decline in communication happens precisely when employees are most in need of clarity and guidance.

"A CEO transition is a major organizational event, and communication inside the company is such an important aspect of that transition." – Raffaella Sadun, Charles E. Wilson Professor of Business Administration at HBS

Routine operations can grind to a halt as teams wait for updates or decisions, leading to confusion and outdated actions. While technology can help - such as using real-time messaging to cut unnecessary emails by 30% - these tools lose their effectiveness when communication is centralised around one person.

Additionally, relying on a single leader increases the risk of miscommunication.

Message Distortion and Lost Details

Another significant challenge is the distortion of information. Miscommunication is a common organisational issue, and it becomes worse when messages are filtered through a single source.

When communication is funnelled through the CEO, there are multiple opportunities for information to be altered. Subordinates might soften bad news or exaggerate successes, distorting the original message. By the time this filtered information is passed back down the chain, it may barely resemble the truth.

This issue worsens as messages spread informally. Complex or unclear communication often turns into rumours, leading to misinformation that can disrupt workplace harmony. Leaders who rely on this centralised approach risk creating what some call a "feedback vacuum", where they are shielded from accurate and honest input.

The combination of altered messages, insufficient repetition, and unclear delivery results in critical details being lost. Strategies may become oversimplified or lack the necessary context, leaving employees without a full understanding of the organisation’s direction.

Reduced Leadership Involvement

When the CEO becomes the sole communicator, other leaders within the organisation often disengage from communication efforts. This sidelining of leadership weakens overall engagement across the company.

The numbers speak volumes: when less than 30% of senior leaders are actively engaged, employee participation averages 44%. However, when executive engagement exceeds 70%, participation jumps to 80%. By centralising communication, CEOs inadvertently signal a lack of trust in other leaders’ ability to handle important messaging, which can have a demoralising effect.

Other leaders may feel undervalued, seeing themselves as passive recipients rather than active contributors to organisational communication. Over time, this dynamic stifles their growth. They miss opportunities to develop essential skills like crafting effective messages, managing sensitive conversations, and communicating strategically.

"The one thing you need to ask yourself as CEO is 'Why do I have to be in every meeting?' Is it that I want to control the meetings or because I don't trust a decision? Those aren't the easiest questions to answer, but you have to be honest with yourself." – Rick Hammell, CEO of Helios

This over-reliance on the CEO not only weakens the leadership pipeline but also creates a self-perpetuating cycle. As other leaders lose confidence in their communication abilities, the CEO feels compelled to take on even more responsibility, further centralising the flow of information.

These challenges underscore the importance of adopting a shared approach to leadership messaging, where communication responsibilities are distributed across the organisation.

Benefits of Shared Leadership Messaging

Relying solely on the CEO to deliver key messages can lead to delays, miscommunication, and disengagement. Adopting a shared leadership approach, however, offers a range of advantages. By decentralising communication, organisations not only improve leadership development but also enhance operational efficiency. Research highlights that shared leadership is 34% more effective, and transparency in communication is linked to a 93% increase in employee happiness. These benefits set the stage for stronger leadership engagement, sharper messaging, and greater organisational agility.

Leaders Take Ownership at All Levels

When communication responsibilities are distributed, leaders across all levels become more engaged. Empowered team leaders can adapt messages to fit their specific context, ask more insightful questions, and develop a deeper grasp of strategic goals. This, in turn, boosts their confidence and effectiveness in communication. The result? Higher employee engagement and lower turnover rates.

But the benefits don’t stop at individual growth. Team members feel more connected to leaders who communicate authentically about shared challenges and opportunities, fostering stronger relationships throughout the organisation.

"Your goal as an executive is to build a company that can run without you, right? [...] That's why it's important to empower your teams to make these decisions instead of relying solely on you." – Shawn Moore, Founder of Solodev

This approach also supports succession planning. By giving employees opportunities to make decisions and communicate strategically, organisations cultivate future leaders while reducing the risks associated with leadership gaps. Leaders who take ownership naturally customise their communication to meet the specific needs of their teams, ensuring messages are both relevant and impactful.

Better Message Fit for Each Team

Shared leadership messaging allows communication to be tailored to the unique needs of each team. Leaders who understand their team’s challenges and workflows can provide messages with greater context and actionable insights, improving both clarity and connection.

This personalised approach strengthens bonds between leaders and their teams. When leaders can address both the organisation’s broader strategy and how it applies to their team’s specific circumstances, it shows they genuinely understand and care about their people’s concerns.

Stronger Organisational Flexibility

Decentralised communication also makes organisations more agile. When multiple leaders are equipped to communicate effectively, teams receive timely updates and can respond swiftly to customer demands, market changes, or internal challenges. Having multiple communication channels ensures important messages are not lost, even if one leader is unavailable.

"In our evolution, embracing decentralised decision-making led to a significant shift in our workplace dynamics. By empowering our employees with the autonomy to make critical decisions, we observed a 20% increase in employee morale... It demonstrated that employees who feel trusted and valued contribute more passionately, directly impacting the company's growth and success." – Holger Sindbaek, Founder of Online Solitaire

The combined effect of these advantages results in organisations that are more responsive, engaged, and prepared to tackle complex challenges. Instead of relying on a single voice to deliver key messages, companies can draw on the collective communication strength of their entire leadership team.

How to Build an Effective Message Cascade

As organisations move away from solely relying on CEO-driven communication, creating a structured message cascade becomes essential. This approach ensures clarity, consistency, and a sense of shared responsibility across leadership levels. A well-designed cascade involves three key elements that work in harmony to establish a strong communication framework.

Align Leaders on the Core Message First

Before any message reaches the wider organisation, it’s crucial that senior leaders are fully aligned on both the content and intent of the communication. This alignment ensures that everyone is on the same page regarding strategic priorities and values, enabling leaders to act cohesively.

The first step is to establish a shared vision and clear goals. Each leader should not only understand the organisation’s direction but also their individual role in achieving it. This clarity helps avoid conflicting messages across departments and addresses the inefficiencies often seen in CEO-centric communication.

Leaders must feel empowered to voice concerns and challenge assumptions during the alignment process. This open dialogue uncovers potential weaknesses in the message early on. Regular check-ins and feedback loops are vital for maintaining alignment and resolving misunderstandings as they arise.

"When leaders cascade information well, it can also lead to increased motivation, engagement, and trust across an organization. As a best practice, it is important a CEO has identified communications channels as well as defined processes that can help streamline the messages they want to deliver. Next it's critical their leadership team cascades that message in a unified way across the organization." – Jennifer L. Pakradooni, Head of External Communications, Newmont Corporation

To facilitate this process, organisations should conduct leadership alignment audits to evaluate current practices. From there, a structured framework can be developed, complete with clear metrics, communication channels, and decision-making processes. Leaders should articulate the strategy clearly, define what success looks like, and take ownership of specific aspects of the plan to ensure accountability.

Once alignment is achieved, the next step is equipping leaders to deliver these messages effectively.

Give Leaders the Right Tools and Background

For leaders to communicate confidently and effectively, they need the right resources and preparation. Strong communication skills, coupled with a collaborative mindset, are essential. Leaders should be able to clearly convey ideas, provide actionable feedback, and offer relevant context.

A lack of preparation can lead to serious consequences, such as reduced morale, unmet goals, and financial losses. In fact, poor communication costs large companies an average of £51.4 million annually. On the flip side, employees who trust their leaders are 12 times more engaged in their work. Addressing these communication gaps is crucial for organisational success.

To support leaders, organisations should provide a toolkit that includes core content, expert guidance, and technology to enhance communication and collaboration skills. This might cover areas like writing, presenting, managing meetings, handling difficult conversations, and building relationships across teams.

Training programmes should focus on developing strategic thinking, audience connection, and trust-building skills. Workshops can help leaders tailor their delivery style to suit different audiences and scenarios, ensuring their messages resonate.

Using multiple communication channels is also key. This allows leaders to share strategy, reinforce organisational values, and deliver essential updates effectively, all while managing busy schedules and competing priorities.

Create Feedback Channels

Feedback channels are critical for building trust, encouraging innovation, and addressing issues before they escalate. They also play a significant role in employee development and improving collaboration across teams. Unlike top-down communication, these channels create a two-way flow of information, preventing the disconnect often seen in CEO-only messaging systems.

Research highlights the importance of meaningful feedback: 80% of employees who received constructive feedback in the past week reported being highly engaged. This demonstrates the value of establishing effective systems for open dialogue.

To design practical feedback channels, start by understanding your audience. Determine what information employees need, how to encourage open communication, and the most comfortable methods for them to share input. This insight helps create systems that employees are more likely to use.

Feedback channels should accommodate diverse preferences and schedules. Options like in-person meetings, written submissions, and anonymous surveys ensure inclusivity. Responding promptly to feedback shows employees that their opinions matter. Organisations should act on suggestions, communicate changes, and regularly share results.

Real-world examples illustrate the impact of effective feedback systems. For instance, a national retail company used employee surveys to address scheduling concerns, introducing a flexible system that reduced turnover and boosted productivity. Similarly, a manufacturing firm improved workplace safety by acting on feedback about equipment and training, leading to fewer accidents and a stronger safety culture.

Consistency and follow-through are key to embedding feedback into the organisational culture. Acknowledge all input, communicate resulting changes, and train managers in active listening and constructive critique. This approach ensures feedback remains a cornerstone of employee engagement and organisational growth.

CEO-Only vs Shared Leadership Messaging

When it comes to leadership communication, the contrast between CEO-only and shared leadership messaging is striking. By exploring these differences, leaders can tailor their strategies to better align with their organisation's goals and challenges.

A study by Harvard Business Review examined 87 companies with co-CEOs and found that these organisations delivered an annual shareholder return of 9.5%, compared to the overall average of 6.9%. This data underscores the potential benefits of distributing leadership responsibilities, including communication, across a broader team.

Leadership consultant Céline Schillinger offers an insightful perspective: "Leadership follows a curious mathematical rule: The more you share it, the bigger it grows". This idea challenges the traditional notion that centralised authority is always more effective, hinting at the power of shared leadership to amplify impact.

Research supports this, showing that shared leadership approaches tend to deliver better results, especially in complex environments where diverse perspectives and quick adaptability are crucial.

Side-by-Side Comparison

The benefits of shared leadership messaging become especially clear in complex work environments. Research highlights that such approaches are more effective in handling challenging, dynamic tasks, whereas traditional leadership tends to work better for standardised operations. This aligns with the needs of modern organisations, where complexity and rapid change are the norm.

Shawn Moore, Founder of MyDigitalShield, frames this shift succinctly:

"Your goal as an executive is to build a company that can run without you, right? [...] That's why it's important to empower your teams to make these decisions instead of relying solely on you."

This mindset emphasises empowerment over control, reshaping how communication flows within organisations.

The collaborative nature of shared leadership messaging also builds trust in ways that a CEO-only approach often cannot. Jimmy Etheredge, CEO of Accenture North America, captures this spirit perfectly:

"We aren't in this to upstage each other. I think of it this way: We don't compete or compare, we share."

Rather than fostering competition among leaders, this approach amplifies messages through collaboration.

Interestingly, research also reveals that shared leadership correlates strongly with team performance, particularly in high-performing teams. In contrast, traditional leadership models are more effective in lower-performing teams. This suggests that as organisations grow and develop greater capabilities, shared messaging becomes increasingly impactful.

In essence, shared leadership messaging supports innovation and dynamic communication, enabling organisations to adapt more effectively to change. On the other hand, CEO-centric messaging often struggles to keep up with the pace of today's fast-moving business landscape.

These differences highlight that choosing between CEO-only and shared leadership messaging isn't just about personal preference. It's about aligning your communication strategy with your organisation's complexity, maturity, and performance goals. This sets the stage for exploring how organisations can transition to a shared messaging model.

Moving to Shared Leadership Communication

Shifting from a CEO-centred approach to shared leadership communication can feel like a significant leap, but it's a necessary step in today’s fast-moving business landscape. Organisations that rely solely on the CEO for messaging often face delays, which can hinder their ability to stay competitive.

To make this transition, a well-planned and balanced strategy is key. Start by defining a clear, concise core message that aligns with your organisation's goals. This clarity ensures the message remains focused as it moves through different levels of leadership, avoiding confusion or dilution.

The next step is identifying the right communicators within your organisation. It’s not always about selecting the most senior executives. Instead, look for individuals who hold influence within their teams - those who are trusted and respected by employees.

While the core message should stay intact, tailor its delivery to suit different audiences. For instance, a strategic update might need a financial focus for the finance team, while the customer service team might benefit from hearing how it impacts customer experience. The challenge lies in addressing specific concerns without losing the essence of the message.

Equip managers with the tools they need to communicate effectively. Provide them with techniques for answering questions, engaging their teams, and delivering information in a relatable way. Jennifer L. Pakradooni, Head of External Communications at Newmont Corporation, highlights the importance of this approach:

"When leaders cascade information well, it can also lead to increased motivation, engagement, and trust across an organization. As a best practice, it is important a CEO has identified communications channels as well as defined processes that can help streamline the messages they want to deliver. Next it's critical their leadership team cascades that message in a unified way across the organization."

Establishing robust feedback systems is equally important. Tools like surveys, one-on-one check-ins, and team discussions help ensure that messages are understood clearly at all levels. This two-way communication builds trust and allows for adjustments where needed.

Leverage collaboration platforms such as Slack or internal wikis to support daily communication and brainstorming. These tools can keep teams aligned while offering the flexibility needed for shared messaging. However, technology alone isn’t enough - a cultural shift is essential to sustain this new approach over time.

Empower influential leaders by providing them with concise toolkits and targeted briefings. This not only reinforces their role in the communication process but also ensures they feel confident in delivering consistent messages.

Regularly monitor progress to ensure alignment across teams. This doesn’t mean micromanaging but rather checking in to confirm consistency while allowing leaders to adapt their delivery style to suit their teams.

Patience and adaptability are crucial throughout this process. Organisations that strike the right balance - maintaining consistency while empowering leaders - will find themselves better equipped to handle the complexities of modern business communication. When executed well, this approach turns communication bottlenecks into a strength, enhancing both organisational agility and employee engagement.

FAQs

How can organisations maintain consistent messaging while embracing a shared leadership communication approach?

To keep messaging consistent in a shared leadership communication model, organisations should begin by crafting a shared narrative that reflects their core goals and values. This approach ensures that leaders, no matter their role or position, deliver a unified message.

Equally important is promoting open communication and building trust among leadership levels. When leaders feel connected and confident, they are more likely to communicate with clarity and consistency. Regular training sessions and updates can help reinforce this alignment, keeping everyone focused on organisational priorities.

By decentralising communication and fostering a collaborative leadership network, organisations not only maintain clarity and consistency but also draw on a range of perspectives to enrich their message.

How can organisations ensure messages remain clear and consistent when shared by multiple leaders?

To ensure messages stay consistent and clear when shared by multiple leaders, organisations should prioritise straightforward and effective communication practices. This means sticking to plain language, steering clear of jargon, and making sure everyone involved fully grasps the key points.

Encouraging regular feedback and practising active listening can uncover potential misunderstandings before they escalate. Establishing formal communication channels and using tools like messaging platforms or video conferencing can also help maintain a unified message. When leaders agree on the purpose and tone of their communication, it not only minimises the chance of mixed messages but also strengthens trust across the organisation.

What are the best tools for leaders to engage their teams and share messages effectively?

Leaders can gain a lot by incorporating evidence-based tools to strengthen team engagement and enhance communication. Tools like employee engagement platforms and feedback systems enable leaders to gather meaningful insights, build trust, and promote open communication within their teams.

Examples of useful resources include employee engagement software, quick pulse surveys, and platforms specifically designed for UK-based organisations. These tools support the creation of a shared messaging approach, fostering collaboration and ensuring clarity throughout all levels of the organisation.

Related posts

• What Causes Confusion in Leadership Messaging
• What stops communication in organisations (And how can leaders avoid pitfalls)
• The Gap Between What You’re Saying and What People Are Hearing